home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!rsiatl!jgd
- From: jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond)
- Newsgroups: rec.autos.tech
- Subject: Re: electronic rustproofing.
- Message-ID: <7tpptah@dixie.com>
- Date: 14 Oct 92 19:18:11 GMT
- References: <2927645605.1.p00140@psilink.com> <70692@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1b4vr3INN5gf@agate.berkeley.edu>
- Organization: Dixie Communications Public Access. The Mouth of the South.
- Lines: 19
-
- avk@hafnium.cchem.berkeley.edu (Tony Konashenok) writes:
-
- >Yes, this method-cathode protection - is absolutely safe, legal and convenient.
-
- Cathodic protection with a lumped cathode is a complete and total sham for
- automobile use unless one can somehow cause all parts of the body to be
- in contact with an electrolyte. This is, of course, impossible. If one
- reads the extremely fine print on these grossly overpriced "corrosion
- protectors", they note that parts to be protected must be coated with
- an extra-cost conductive film. What a fraud
-
- John
-
- --
- John De Armond, WD4OQC |Interested in high performance mobility?
- Performance Engineering Magazine (TM) |
- Marietta, Ga |Interested in high tech and computers?
- jgd@dixie.com |Write me about PE Magazine
- Need Usenet public Access in Atlanta? Write Me for info on Dixie.com.
-