home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.rumors:1014 alt.conspiracy:10640
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!ccsvax.sfasu.edu!f_gautjw
- From: f_gautjw@ccsvax.sfasu.edu
- Newsgroups: talk.rumors,alt.conspiracy
- Subject: Re: Bo Gritz and Idaho situation
- Message-ID: <1992Sep15.194512.970@ccsvax.sfasu.edu>
- Date: 15 Sep 92 19:45:11 CST
- References: <1992Sep15.152807.12415@en.ecn.purdue.edu> <1992Sep15.162840.12481@afterlife.ncsc.mil> <1992Sep15.150532.27998@hellgate.utah.edu> <1992Sep15.231012.19655@afterlife.ncsc.mil>
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: Stephen F. Austin State University
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <1992Sep15.231012.19655@afterlife.ncsc.mil>, acadams@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Arthur C. Adams) writes:
- > In article <1992Sep15.150532.27998@hellgate.utah.edu> dpugmire%peruvian.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (David Pugmire) writes:
- >>>A letter in the Washington Post today states that Bo Gritz
- >>>is the nominee of the "Progressive Party", the party under
- >>>which David Duke ran for the White House in '88.
- >>
- >>I'm probably wrong, but I thought Bo Gritz was running for the
- >>Populist Party.
- >
- >
- > Come to think of it, it _was_ the Populist Party.
- > The point isn't the name, the point is the Duke ties.
- > --
- > The world is not analog. The world is digital,
- > with an incredible number of bits.
- > Arthur C. Adams (not the comic-book artist) <fnord>
- > E-Mail acadams@afterlife.ncsc.mil
-
- Out of curiosity I phoned someone this afternoon who is supposed to know.
- I understand he is on the ballot in about 25 states. Of those states
- he is listed in most of them as an Independent. In three or four states
- he is on the "America First Party" ticket (or some similar name) and
- if I heard correctly he is on the populist ticket (not certain of name)
- in about three states. He is not on the ballot in Texas.
-
- Having watched David Duke over a period of time in the neighboring
- state of Louisiana and having barely glimpsed Bo Gritz, my first impression
- is that the two are no way similar.
-