home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.environment:3652 sci.environment:11254 alt.activism:16144 talk.politics.misc:44701
- Path: sparky!uunet!gossip.pyramid.com!pyramid!oracle!unrepliable!bounce
- From: rchilder@us.oracle.com (Richard Childers)
- Newsgroups: talk.environment,sci.environment,alt.activism,talk.politics.misc
- Subject: Re: NEWS: Radioactive Sand Proves Nuclear Reprocessing Unlawful
- Message-ID: <1992Sep11.001725.18336@oracle.us.oracle.com>
- Date: 11 Sep 92 00:17:25 GMT
- References: <Greenpeace.1Sep1992.8am1@naughty-peahen.org> <1992Sep8.190417.29216@oracle.us.oracle.com>
- Sender: usenet@oracle.us.oracle.com (Oracle News Poster)
- Organization: Memes-R-Us
- Lines: 32
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hqsun4.us.oracle.com
- X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user
- at Oracle Corporation. The opinions expressed are those
- of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle.
-
- mfriedma@uucp (Michael Friedman) writes:
-
- >>GERMANY, August 18, 1992 (GP) In an old bunker in the free port
- >>of Hamburg Greenpeace is today presenting to the press
- >>radioactive sand contaminated with plutonium.
-
- >How contaminated is it? There is a big defference between detectable
- >levels of contamination and dangerous levels of contamination.
-
- .
- .
- .
-
- >>Up to 27.5 million curies of radioactivity will then be
- >>released annually. This may be compared with
- >>the approximately 50 million curies which, according to
- >>official data, were released at Chernobyl during the
- >>accident.
-
- Gee, Michael, why do you ask questions that are answered below ?
-
- >Now why do I think that something in that paragraph smells fishy?
-
- Because you read it with blinders on.
-
- -- richard
-
- --
- =====
- -- richard childers rchilder@us.oracle.com 1 415 506 2411
- oracle data center -- unix systems & network administration
- Klein flask for rent. Inquire within.
-