home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20 / NN_1992_20.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 36369 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-09-14  |  1.6 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!purdue!yuma!longs.lance.colostate.edu!sa114984
  2. From: sa114984@longs.lance.colostate.edu (Steven Arnold)
  3. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  4. Subject: Re: Badges of Honor
  5. Message-ID: <Sep14.173415.54646@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU>
  6. Date: 14 Sep 92 17:34:15 GMT
  7. References: <1992Sep05.081218.12140@watson.ibm.com> <Sep12.074253.38224@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> <1992Sep12.155140.28327@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
  8. Sender: news@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU (News Account)
  9. Organization: Colorado State U. Engineering College, Ft. Collins, CO 80523
  10. Lines: 20
  11.  
  12. In article <1992Sep12.155140.28327@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis) writes:
  13. |> In article <Sep12.074253.38224@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> 
  14. |> sa114984@longs.lance.colostate.edu (Steven Arnold) writes:
  15. |> 
  16. |> }    Yeah, and what if the hang glider did something to cause the guy to be
  17. |> }hooked up in it?  If the hang glider swooped down and grabbed the guy, for
  18. |> }instance (still assuming the hang glider is a person), then it seems to me that
  19. |> }the hang glider wouldn't have a right to just let him go in mid-air, would it?
  20. |> 
  21. |> What a concept!  I think I see why people might shoot hang gliders on 
  22. |> sight.  I'm not sure if a hang glider would have the right to let someone
  23. |> go in mid-air, but if they had that capability, who knows, it might even 
  24. |> be a right.  I sure doubt that I would support legislation making that
  25. |> illegal, however...
  26.  
  27.     Do you mean to suggest, Galen, that if hang gliders were persons you
  28. wouldn't want to make it illegal for them to swoop down and pick up people, and
  29. then drop them from mid-air?
  30.  
  31. Steve
  32.