home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!The-Village!waterbed
- From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
- Subject: Re: The christian perspective...?
- Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
- Message-ID: <1992Sep12.222511.30814@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 22:25:11 GMT
- Distribution: usa
- Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
- Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
- Nntp-Posting-Host: netslip63.watson.ibm.com
- Organization: The Village Waterbed
- Lines: 18
-
- In <1992Sep11.221625.1@vf.jsc.nasa.gov> mcmillan@vf.jsc.nasa.gov writes:
- > In article <24887@oasys.dt.navy.mil>, bense@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Ron Bense) writes
- > > In talk.abortion, mcmillan@vf.jsc.nasa.gov writes:
- >
- > I imagine you
- > would have been mighty unhappy *while* you were being aborted.
-
- You have a vivid imagination. The early-term fetus is incapable of
- being happy or unhappy.
-
- > Although I'm not an expert in this, as I'm sure you're not also, I believe
- > you're wrong about the unborn not feeling pain. If it can feel then it can
- > feel pain, I presume. Ever touch a bump on your pregnant wife's stomach and
- > then have it move in response to your touch?
-
- Feeling implies consciousness. Reaction to stimuli does not imply feeling.
-
- Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
-