home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!nigel.msen.com!caen!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!scotts
- From: scotts@CS.CMU.EDU (Scott Safier)
- Subject: Re: Chaney's sig
- In-Reply-To: decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com's message of Thu, 10 Sep 1992 12:17:32 GMT
- Message-ID: <SCOTTS.92Sep10141204@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU>
- Originator: scotts@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU
- Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: morpheus.cimds.ri.cmu.edu
- Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University
- References: <SCOTTS.92Sep8173613@MORPHEUS.CIMDS.RI.CMU.EDU>
- <BuAoD7.FM4.2@cs.cmu.edu> <1992Sep10.004317.17482@csus.edu>
- <1992Sep10.121732.22743@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 19:12:04 GMT
- Lines: 77
-
- In article <1992Sep10.121732.22743@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz) writes:
- In article <1992Sep10.004317.17482@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
-
- > Okay, Susan Garvin, I'll challenge you directly and show you once and
- > for all how 100% WRONG you are.
- >
- > Of course it's always been well known that I could beat you in a
- > debate hands-down, but seeing as that you want to press it, I'll show
- > the newbies again.
- Uh, yeah, right. If that's the case, why do you go on to
- completely fail in your attempt?
-
- To amuse the net?
-
- > >## "My logic is based on ... a religious perspective which says
- > >## that personhood begins at birth (actually a month after birth if
- > >## we want to be precise)..."
- > >## -- Gloria Feldt,
-
- > >## "I see nothing extreme or reprehensible about this statement."
- > >## -- garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin) <BtnDAw.Iwo.2@cs.cmu.edu>
- Note that nowhere in Ms Feldt's statement is there any indication
- that she would make her personal religious viewpoint the law
- of the land.
-
- Dean, why would Chaney want to do that? Then he couldn't fantasize
- about his "manlihood" and how much better he is than anyone else.
-
- > Okay, Susan Garvin: Point out the anti-semitism in my .sig.
- The anti-Semitism is inherent in criticizing her religious
- beliefs, especially as she nowhere seeks to impose them on
- anyone else via legislation.
-
- Also, no where does she say she is Jewish. The only thing Jewish is
- her name. I think Chaney is being anti-(religion different than his
- own).
-
- > 2) Is there or is there not religious freedom in the First Amendment?
- No, there is not. There is a prohibition on Congress from
- making any law establishing religion. I am not sure what your
- strange and garbled sentence is supposed to mean. "Religous
- freedom in the First Amendment?" There are words in the first
- amendment.
- Also Congress cannot restrict the free excercise of religion, unless
- you aren't Christian then they can (like smoking Peyote in a
- religious ceremony)
-
- [Dean's explaination of Chaney's "thoughts" deleted for brevity]
-
- Dean, you are showing the patience of a true hero. Susan must be very
- proud of the way you try to explain to Chaney why he is an idiot. But
- I bet he doesn't understand you.
-
- Congratulations. Please follow up your foolishness by declaring
- victory.
-
- Don't worry, he will.
-
- > Class over.
- > This is how you put a complete and total end to a complete and total
- > asshole like Susan Garvin.
-
- Never one to disappoint, after managing to fail completely,
- Chahallney declares victory.
-
- By the way, for those who don't know Susan Garvin, she's a
- terrific person.
-
- Well, she's OK, except she has this bad habit of painting my mother's
- dog. (yes, I know this statement is ambiguous. I mean she applies
- paint to the dog.)
-
- Anyone want a gif of Susan :-)
-
- Scott
-
-
-