home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!convex!linac!uchinews!ellis!eeb1
- From: eeb1@ellis.uchicago.edu (e elizabeth bartley)
- Subject: Re: FOCA: And I quote.....
- Message-ID: <1992Sep6.015506.3968@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: eeb1@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
- References: <182pdpINN16q@gilligan.East.Sun.COM> <nyikos.715471986@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <18511vINN1ih@gilligan.East.Sun.COM>
- Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 01:55:06 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <18511vINN1ih@gilligan.East.Sun.COM>
- mike@gilligan.East.Sun.COM (Mike Roncadori) writes:
- >In article <nyikos.715471986@milo.math.scarolina.edu>
- >nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
-
- >>Scientists and doctors were near unanimity about human life beginning
- >>at conception until it became politically convenient to claim that
- >>it began some other time.
-
- >Can you back this up with references? I want to read it some-
- >where besides here.
-
- I think he's exaggerating, but the AMA did lead the charge to outlaw
- abortion, way back when. However, I don't think doctors changed their
- minds because it became "politically convenient" to do so; my theory
- is that the doctor's minds were changed by an increase of information.
- Doctors were pro-life when the AMA wanted to outlaw abortion because
- it became clear that the z/e/f's development was a continual process
- with no sharp dividing lines from conception to birth. Now, the
- majority of doctors are (I think) pro-choice because the stages in
- this development are clearer.
-
- --
- Pro-Choice Anti-Roe - E. Elizabeth Bartley
- Abortions should be safe, legal, early, and rare.
-
- Cthulhu for President -- when you're tired of voting for the lesser of 2 evils.
-