home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:35157 alt.abortion.inequity:3546
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!psuvax1!castor.cs.psu.edu!beaver
- From: beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver)
- Subject: Re: Observations
- Message-ID: <Bu37J0.Avr@cs.psu.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: castor.cs.psu.edu
- References: <1992Sep04.142221.30426@watson.ibm.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1992 04:08:59 GMT
- Lines: 73
-
- In article <1992Sep04.142221.30426@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:
- >In <Bu1FJD.F5L@cs.psu.edu> beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >> In article <1992Sep03.215609.14780@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.ibm.com writes
- >> >In <Bu09ut.Es5@cs.psu.edu> beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >>
- >> Referring to "enforce" defined as "strengthen":
- >> >> In which case, it is natural to conclude that a law permitting abortion
- >> >> "enforces" the belief that fetuses are not persons/children/human-lives.
- >> >
- >> >Not really, because it's a religious belief. For example,
- >> >
- >> >> And yes, our laws do "enforce" (to a much lesser extent) the belief
- >> >> that killing cattle is not wrong.
- >> >
- >> >Do you really believe that someone who believes cattle to be holy changes
- >> >their mind because it's legal here? I don't; I think they're more likely
- >> >to see those who eat steak as sinners.
- >>
- >> I don't have any basis for making such a judgement.
- >
- >Well, let's see... Abortion has been legal in this country for 20 years.
- >Have all the people that think it's wrong changed their minds?
-
- A clarification: I was referring to your example regarding cattle.
-
- Now, why should all the people that think abortion is wrong have
- changed their minds? It suffices merely that +some+ people may
- have changed their minds or that more people believe abortion is okay,
- if you want to address whether legalized abortion has strengthened
- pro-abortion beliefs.
-
- >> One example that
- >> does come to mind is that eating pork is legal; if it were illegal,
- >> perhaps fewer Jewish people would eat pork. Hence, the legality
- >> of eating pork does tend to strengthen the belief that eating pork
- >> is not immoral/unholy/sinful. (This strays a bit, since it's not
- >> that pigs are holy but that eating them is religiously banned.)
- >
- >Actually, it strays a lot, because many Jews believe that it was
- >banned for health reasons, and that now that those health reasons
- >no longer apply, eating it is OK. This has nothing to do with the
- >legality of it.
-
- I'm not an expert on Judaism or Jewish law, but I was under the impression
- that, regardless of what motivation lies behind principles such as kashrut,
- they are and were religious, as well as part of "law." Modern
- rationalizations ("it's just an outmoded health concern") do not
- deny the religious side.
-
- >Also, note that Jews don't feel it necessary for non-Jews to conform to
- >Jewish law, so they wouldn't be calling those eating non-kosher foods
- >"sinners" anyway.
-
- Try suggesting this to an Orthodox Jew (I suggest you go to Mea Shearim
- in Jerusalem) and see what response you get. For a Jew to eat non-kosher
- foods is reprehensible. If your "those" refers only to non-Jews,
- then you have conveniently omitted those Jews who eat non-kosher.
-
- >> And, beliefs regarding abortion are not necessarily religious.
- >> My beliefs regarding abortion are certainly not; they arise from
- >> consideration of morals, philosophical principles of justice and equity,
- >> pragmatism, and a bit of scientific experience (research on reproduction).
- >
- >You mean they weren't forced on you by the legality of abortion?
-
- No. Have I ever said they were?
-
- We go in circles: there is a difference between "force on" and "enforce,"
- as both our dictionaries have already revealed.
-
- Don
- --
- beaver@cs.psu.edu Opinions from the PC-challenged
-