home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!firth
- From: firth@sei.cmu.edu (Robert Firth)
- Subject: Re: Hidden variable theories, was: Uncertainty Princi
- Message-ID: <1992Sep11.115927.13266@sei.cmu.edu>
- Organization: Software Engineering Institute
- References: <mcirvin.716138484@husc8> <1992Sep10.160053.23315@sei.cmu.edu> <mcirvin.716153312@husc8>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 11:59:27 GMT
- Lines: 10
-
- In article <mcirvin.716153312@husc8> mcirvin@husc8.harvard.edu (Mcirvin) writes:
-
- >I justify my original decision to put in the word "future" by the
- >fact that, operationally, that's what it looks like
-
- Fair enough, Matt. Your amplified statement is one I agree with almost
- 100%. The only reservation is that we really haven't looked all that
- hard for phenomena that would imply a pastward flow of causality. But
- then, I have very little idea just what kind of phenomenon one would
- look for. Any speculations?
-