home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!news.byu.edu!ux1!mica.inel.gov!guinness!opal.idbsu.edu!holmes
- From: holmes@opal.idbsu.edu (Randall Holmes)
- Subject: Re: What's going on here ???
- Message-ID: <1992Sep11.152945.2267@guinness.idbsu.edu>
- Sender: usenet@guinness.idbsu.edu (Usenet News mail)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: opal
- Organization: Boise State University Math Dept.
- References: <1992Sep11.214701.783@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 15:29:45 GMT
- Lines: 76
-
- In article <1992Sep11.214701.783@csc.canterbury.ac.nz> wft@math.canterbury.ac.nz (Bill Taylor) writes:
- >The following rather silly problem cropped up in our department just now.
- >
- >Evaluate S = 0! - 1! + 2! - 3! + 4! - ....
- >
- >(yes, I know it's divergent, but blame Euler, not me.)
-
- It converges in the p-adic numbers, does it not?
-
- >
- >------------------------
- >Crazy solution (1)
- >
- > oo oo oo oo oo oo
- > \~~ n \~~ n / n -x / -x \~~ n / -x 1
- >S = > (-1) n! = > (-1) | x e dx = | e >(-x) dx = | e --- dx
- > /__ /__ / / /__ / 1+x
- > n=0 n=0 0 0 n=0 0
- >
- > = .5963..
- >
- >-----------------------
- >Crazy solution (2)
- >
- > 2 3 4
- >S = f(1) where f(x) = 0! - x 1! + x 2! - x 3! + x 4! - ...
- >
- > 2 3
- >So (x f(x))' = 1! - x 2! + x 3! - x 4! + ...
- >
- > = (1 - f(x))/x
- > 2 1 1
- >Thus x f' + (1+x)f = 1 this has integrating factor - exp(- ---)
- > x x
- >
- >Thus [ x exp(-1/x) f(x) ]' = exp(-1/x)/x
- >
- > x
- > /
- >thus x exp(-x) f(x) = | exp(-1/t)/t dt now put x=1
- > /
- > 0
- > 1
- > /
- >thus f(1)/e = | exp(-1/t)/t dt and put u=1/t
- > /
- > 0
- > oo
- > /
- > = e | exp(-u)/u du = .5963..
- > /
- > 1
- >
- >being essentially the same integral as in crazy solution (1).
- >-----------------------
- >
- >So what's going on here ????
- >
- >Two crazy solutions to a crazy problem giving the same answer. Why ?
- >
- >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- > Bill Taylor wft@math.canterbury.ac.nz
- >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- > MATH: necessary consequences of arbitrary axioms about meaningless things.
- >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- >
-
- Maybe it has something to do with the fact noted above. Algebraic
- manipulations of formal series often do give sensible results, which
- might _really_ work in an unintended interpretation. After all,
- ...1111 (base 2) _is_ -1 in the 2-adics.
- --
- The opinions expressed | --Sincerely,
- above are not the "official" | M. Randall Holmes
- opinions of any person | Math. Dept., Boise State Univ.
- or institution. | holmes@opal.idbsu.edu
-