home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaez
- From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez)
- Subject: Re: measures of the `size' of infinite sets
- Message-ID: <1992Sep9.062701.8487@galois.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@galois.mit.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: riesz
- Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA
- References: <1992Sep8.134624.11005@newstand.syr.edu> <1992Sep9.042345.7472@galois.mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 92 06:27:01 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1992Sep9.042345.7472@galois.mit.edu> jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes:
-
- >Well, there are various ways of keeping track of the "size" of infinite
- >sets, depending on the context. One branch of math that specializes
- ^in
-
- >this is called measure theory. The simplest example of that is the fact
- >that a line segment which is twice as long as another has twice the
- >"measure," even though by Cantor's definition they have the same number
- >of points. But for your problem the best answer involves not measure
- >but "density". Given a set of integers, we calculate its density as
- >follows. Figure out how many integers in your set lie between -n and n
- >- say that m do. Take the ratio n/2m ... this just tells us what
- >fraction of the integers between -n and n lie in your set. Now take the
- >limit as n goes to infinity! If the limit exists and equals d (some
- >number between 0 and 1), we say your set has density d.
-
- Okay, I got that one messed up all right. Take the ratio m/(2n+1),
- since there are 2n+1 integers between -n and n, counting the endpoints.
-