home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!desire.wright.edu!demon
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Subject: Economic motivations...
- Message-ID: <1992Sep4.144834.3921@desire.wright.edu>
- From: demon@desire.wright.edu (Stupendous Man)
- Date: 4 Sep 92 14:48:34 EST
- References: <1992Sep1.094859.3841@desire.wright.edu> <52804@dime.cs.umass.edu> <23141@hacgate.SCG.HAC.COM> <52933@dime.cs.umass.edu>
- Organization: Demonic Possesions, Inc.
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <52933@dime.cs.umass.edu>, yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu (victor yodaiken) writes:
- ...
- > Honesty and clarity. Economics is deeply connected to morality, and it
-
- No, it is not.
-
- Economic justifications, however, frequently are.
-
- > is either disingenuous of simply mistaken to claim that one's economic
- > program is based on scientific principles alone. Even if economics were
-
- Not if your program is merely to make the economy grow, and not to
- reward a certain sector.
-
- > advanced far beyond its current fuzzy level, it would still not tell
- > us whether GDP measured wealth, what is involved in a "living standard",
- > or what the proper relationship between humans and the environment should
- > be. Thus when anyone, be they Marxist or "free-marketist" claims that
- > his/her economic program is determined by scientific/economic principles
- > which are free of moral content, it is sensible to be very suspicious.
-
- It's sensible to be suspicious no matter what the underlying motivation
- may be.
-
- Brett
- _______________________________________________________________________________
- Proconsul Computer Consulting CHA-CHING!
- Better, Cheaper, Faster (Pick any two :)
- Disclaimer: NOT!
-