home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky rec.scouting:2927 alt.discrimination:4220 chi.general:1043 alt.atheism:16780 alt.politics.homosexuality:5805
- Newsgroups: rec.scouting,alt.discrimination,chi.general,alt.atheism,alt.politics.homosexuality
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!sgi!fido!zola!solntze.esd.sgi.com!livesey
- From: livesey@solntze.esd.sgi.com (Jon Livesey)
- Subject: Re: BofA and UW can now support discrimination against blacks and Jews
- Message-ID: <pjt2nhg@zola.esd.sgi.com>
- Sender: news@zola.esd.sgi.com (Net News)
- Organization: sgi
- References: <piqhjko@zola.esd.sgi.com> <1992Sep8.025839.27590@cs.yale.edu> <pit07d0@zola.esd.sgi.com> <1992Sep8.144802.4475@cs.yale.edu>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Tue, 8 Sep 92 21:59:10 GMT
- Lines: 71
-
- In article <1992Sep8.144802.4475@cs.yale.edu>, rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla) writes:
- |> In article <pit07d0@zola.esd.sgi.com> livesey@solntze.esd.sgi.com (Jon Livesey) writes:
- |> >
- |> >
- |> >Now I'm not a brain surgeon, so if I followed your reasoning,
- |> >and tried to fix your brain hemorrhage the results would be
- |> >disastrous.
- |>
- |> You would wish, would you not, that I try to obtain for you
- |> medical attention?
-
- There is a big difference between getting a qualified person to
- help, and insisting on helping yourself.
-
- I have no objection if someone wants to pray for me. It's
- when they want to coerce me to accept their help that I object.
-
- |>
- |> >As I explained before, this is your fallacy. It's not any
- |> >arbitrary help whatsoever that you desire, but qualified help
- |> >from qualified people.
- |>
- |> Most Christians believe themselves to be qualified.
- |> This is, therefore, a nit.
-
- No it's not. Now you have to say "If I was in situation X
- I would want help even from someone who only believed themselves
- to be qualified: whose help might in fact be disastrous"
-
- Is that the kind of help you want?
-
-
- |>
- |> > And the fact that you would want
- |> >help in one situation does not let you assume that others
- |> >would want help in that situation, or qualify you to offer
- |> >help.
- |>
- |> Then one is failing to apply the golden rule, Mr. Livesey.
- |> It states, quite clearly that one is to DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU
- |> WOULD HAVE THEM DO UNTO YOU.
-
- But that's the whole point. Unless you say "I would want help
- from any malicious or incompetent person who decides to interfere"
- then you are not doing unto others as you would have them do unto
- you.
-
- When you cut through the crap, the real problem with your argument
- is your formulation of the Golden Rule. Instead of "Do unto others
- as you would have them do unto you" you want it to say "If you
- claim to be willing to accept coercion in your own life, you may
- coerce other people".
-
- But this is a hoax, for the people who claim "If I were Gay,
- I would want someone to make me straight" are *not* Gay. They
- are not in the situation in which they claim they would want to
- be coerced, and never will be.
-
- So they are trying to trade their claim to want coercion in a
- situation they will never be in, for the right to coerce others.
-
- It's a bit like the Grand Inquisitor saying "If I were a
- heretic, I would want them to burn me" or a Nazi saying "If
- I were a Jew I would want them to gas me". But the Grand
- Inquisitor is *not* a heretic, and the Nazi is *not* a Jew,
- so their appeal to the Golden rule is not being made in good
- faith.
-
- And neither is yours.
-
- jon.
-