home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky rec.scouting:2887 alt.discrimination:4171 chi.general:1014 alt.atheism:16701 alt.politics.homosexuality:5751
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!sgigate!odin!sgihub!zola!solntze.esd.sgi.com!livesey
- From: livesey@solntze.esd.sgi.com (Jon Livesey)
- Newsgroups: rec.scouting,alt.discrimination,chi.general,alt.atheism,alt.politics.homosexuality
- Subject: Re: BofA and UW can now support discrimination against blacks and Jews
- Message-ID: <pio27c8@zola.esd.sgi.com>
- Date: 8 Sep 92 00:55:42 GMT
- References: <hill.715545153@galena12> <1992Sep4.201833.17472@auto-trol.com> <AWERLING.92Sep7175340@dante.nmsu.edu> <1992Sep8.003336.26448@cs.yale.edu>
- Sender: news@zola.esd.sgi.com (Net News)
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: sgi
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1992Sep8.003336.26448@cs.yale.edu>, rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla) writes:
- |>
- |> To be honest, what you happen to think about the etiology of sexual
- |> preference is of approximately zero relevance to the truth about
- |> what controls sexual preference. People are notoriously bad judges
- |> of their own psychology.
-
- Well, supposing that to be true, so what? If people are bad
- judges of their own psychology, what qualifies you to judge
- the psychology of others? Nothing, would be my first guess.
-
- So probably we would all be better off with you letting people
- live the life they feel best with, so long as they don't harm
- other people doing it.
-
- And if it's not the life you would lead, well, you said yourself
- that you are not qualifed to judge your own psychology.
-
- jon.
-