home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.autos.tech
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!tedebear
- From: tedebear@leland.Stanford.EDU (Theodore Chen)
- Subject: Re: What's a good one??? was Re: CLUB Story
- Message-ID: <1992Sep12.172208.2617@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- Followup-To: rec.autos
- Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
- Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
- References: <Bu274D.2uy.1@cs.cmu.edu> <60094@mimsy.umd.edu> <Bu8o2o.B8r.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: Sat, 12 Sep 92 17:22:08 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- In article <Bu8o2o.B8r.1@cs.cmu.edu> rudis+@cs.cmu.edu (Rujith S DeSilva) writes:
- >I originally suggested hooking up the alarm system to release tear gas. A
- >friend suggested that it should instead release a tranquilizer. This can't be
- >considered to harm anyone, can it?
-
- well, you could still get sued. somebody might argue that you should
- have forseen that a thief would get zapped with it, stagger around for
- a few seconds, and then collapse in front of a semi driving by.
-
- wasn't there a thread about electrifying the car before?
- -teddy
- followups to rec.autos
-