home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky misc.consumers:16507 alt.censorship:7470 alt.discrimination:4369
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!usc!rutgers!psinntp!psinntp!newstand.syr.edu!greeny
- From: greeny@top.cis.syr.edu (J. S. Greenfield)
- Newsgroups: misc.consumers,alt.censorship,alt.discrimination
- Subject: Re: Waldenbooks fires staff for refusing to sell racist book!
- Message-ID: <1992Sep13.013128.7267@newstand.syr.edu>
- Date: 13 Sep 92 05:31:27 GMT
- References: <BuF4xE.63s@cs.psu.edu> <1992Sep11.183119.15009@m.cs.uiuc.edu> <1992Sep11.204848.10576@tss.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: Syracuse University, CIS Dept.
- Lines: 38
-
- In article <1992Sep11.204848.10576@tss.com> burke@tss.com (Jim Burke) writes:
- >|>
- >|> I oppose this boycott not because I think boycotts are inherently
- >|> immoral, but because I oppose its goals, namely, the suppression of
- >|> material that some people find offensive.
- >
- >
- >It seems to me that there are two types of boycott, and this is reflected
- >in the definitions given in my own dictionary. One definition is given
- >as "To join together in refusing to deal with, so as to punish, coerce, etc."
- >This would seem to be the definition Mr. Kadie is applying to his
- >understanding of Mr. So's article. However, another definition of boycott
- >is "To refuse to buy, sell, or use [to _boycott_ a newspaper]. The second
- >definition is less agressive and it is one that I use all the time. I
- >don't agree with the editorial policies of the San Jose Mercury News - I
- >feel they slant the news with their own editorial bias, so I personally
- >boycott the SJMN. I am not trying to suppress their rights, I simply don't
- >agree with their journalistic policies. I have not organized a public
- >boycott in order to shut them down, however. I also boycott lots of products
- >I consider shoddy.
-
- I dunno. It happens that my dictionary lists only the first breed of boycott,
- but then again its a pocket dictionary.
-
- In any case, in common use, the first meaning of "boycott" is by far most
- likely to be the intent when someone uses the word. When the word carries
- such baggage with it, I think it's fairly safe to assume that they mean
- "boycott" in the sense of the first definition, unless they explicitly
- suggest otherwise (or at least the context suggests otherwise).
-
- In this case, the context clearly suggests a "boycott" of the first type.
-
-
- --
- J. S. Greenfield greeny@top.cis.syr.edu
- (I like to put 'greeny' here,
- but my d*mn system wants a
- *real* name!) "What's the difference between an orange?"
-