home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!ukma!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!rich
- From: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu (Rich Winkel)
- Subject: Thailand Election Results
- Message-ID: <1992Sep14.225502.29607@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Originator: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Organization: PACH
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 22:55:02 GMT
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Lines: 68
-
- /** reg.seasia: 201.0 **/
- ** Topic: Thailand Election **
- ** Written 11:08 pm Sep 14, 1992 by NOSCA@f214.n61.z90.pegasus.oz.au in cdp:reg.seasia **
- [Forwarded by NOSCA in peg:reg.seasia on 14th Sept 92]
-
- * Originally forwarded from Asia-Pacific Solidarity (Bangkok)
- * Originally dated Sun 13 Sep 92 21:58
-
- The general election held today gave an already-expected
- results. No parties received a majority seat to form the
- government. So, coalition is inevitable. The matter now is
- whether those which "appearred (or pretended) to be
- progressive" political parties can work out the "formula"
- (i.e. quota for ministerial positions) among themselves.
- If not, right-winger and political-opportunist parties will
- intervene and take a share. I don't really know whether I
- should pray for the former or not as I can really predict
- that we will very soon have to launch a campaign against
- policies of these coalition government.
-
- Vote-buying, though less blatant, was by no means less
- wide-spread. Reports made to the Poll Watch Committee
- confirmed that political parties continue to buy their way to
- the Parliament by "cash" (e.g. 50-100 baht) than convincing
- the electorates of their policy platform. Despite a very
- strong campaign in all mass media by the government, NGOs,
- and even private sector, vote-buying remained an undeniable
- fact of Thai politics. However, blaming the poor is not at
- all fair. For the rural poor, it makes really no
- differences (in term of policy direction) who would become
- the new PM or government. Agricultural product prices
- would remain low. Genuine development would continue to
- by-pass the rural poor. Natural resources in rural areas,
- the livelihood based of the rural poor, would continue to
- be plundered for the benefits of the urban rich under the
- name of "the national prosperity". Accepting some money
- from the contesting candiates is better than nothing.
-
- In Thailand, or any other "newly advanced countries",
- vote-buying is always an effective election tactic employed
- by political parties in power. Development projects,
- public services, and urban-biased policies are very often
- approved or provided in the wake of election period. This
- kind of vote-buying is just more sophisticated than the one
- we see in rural Thailand, even though their essence is the
- same. In Malaysia, rivalies between the state and federal
- govts (especially those of opposite parties) represent this
- phenomnon very well. In Singapore, cheap public housing
- services by-pass certain constituencies that there was an
- electorates' swing against the government party. What are
- the differences?
-
- An interesting phenomenon is the role of media. There
- seems to be a very unified and vast interests in covering
- the election news, right from the beginning of the campaign.
- Every night, there were talk show programmes, interviews,
- and news on the election, so much so that I myself became sick
- of it. It appearred as if the election was THE only
- thing in democracy, in which if you went out and voted, then
- everything would be taken care of by the MPs. Well, what an
- elite political bull-shits!
-
- Asia-Pacific Solidarity (Bangkok)
-
- --- FD 1.99c
- * Origin: Network of Overseas Students Collectives in Australia(NOSCA) (90:61/214)
- --
- ** End of text from cdp:reg.seasia **
-