home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!rich
- From: jad@ckuxb.att.com (John A Dinardo)
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Subject: Part IV, PACIFICA RADIO Investigates the Murder of President Kennedy
- Keywords: researchers' revelations about the assassination of President Kennedy
- Message-ID: <1992Sep11.180122.28497@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Date: 11 Sep 92 18:01:22 GMT
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Distribution: na
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
- Lines: 151
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Originator: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
-
-
- I made the following transcript from a tape recording
- of a broadcast by Pacifica Radio station
- WBAI-FM (99.5)
- 505 Eighth Ave., 19th Fl.
- New York, NY 10018 (212) 279-0707
-
- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
- (continuation)
- HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
- Before I get to that, you had asked me a question on this medical
- evidence. Do you recall?
-
- GARY NULL:
- Yes. I asked you for the evidence of forgery and retouching in
- the autopsy photographs and X-rays.
-
- HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
- This is my special area of research. I discovered that the X-rays
- were fake in that they show the entire face missing on the right
- side. And again, this is what JAMA tried to head off at the press
- conference today. They tried to ridicule criticism of the medical
- evidence without facing these facts. And I asked them at the
- press conference: "Didn't you notice that the face is missing --
- that the President's face is missing in the X-rays, but it's NOT
- missing in the photographs?" And, of course, at that point, the
- press conference became tumultuous, and the whole thing began to
- be overturned. The photographs, of course, show extensive
- retouching and evidence of forgery. And this was directly how the
- Chief Justice of the United States was tricked -- with this faked
- evidence. The doctors, most recently (quite a few that JAMA did
- not interview, and they don't dare interview, and if they did,
- like other researchers, they're not going to report it) ....
- because those doctors insist, to this day, that that throat wound
- WAS an entry hole. And the many people who were at the autopsy
- .... and Doctor Fink, the forensic pathologist who was at the
- autopsy, who was not interviewed by JAMA, and whom they claimed
- declined, and I've talked to him. But he testified that the hole
- in the back was an entry hole that did not penetrate into the
- chest. So what JAMA did -- and as Jim Marrs just said: They're a
- political action committee that doesn't dare let this evidence
- link up because .... they've kept it compartmentalized. I asked
- them: "What about Doctor Humes's stating at the end of his
- testimony to Arlen Specter that the bullet that hit John Connally
- could not possibly have been the same bullet that went through
- John Kennedy because of the fragments that were found in Connally?"
- They said: "We did not discuss John Connally in this article.
- It's not relevant." So that's an example of compartmentalizing
- the evidence by a political action committee which has sought
- to control the medical community in this country.
-
- GARY NULL:
- Okay. Let's try to go back to the photographs. And please, if
- you would, try to keep .... we have limited time and we want the
- opportunity for you to give us as much information as you can.
- Let's go specifically to the fraud that you are asserting, and
- on the retouching of the photographs that no one else in the media
- has picked up on.
-
- HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
- Right. This is the key to the case, right now. The Chief Justice,
- Earl Warren (and he mentions in his memoirs that he was shown
- autopsy photographs) [said] that he was tricked by phony
- photographs and X-rays which apparently show a shot that came from
- behind. They claim that there is an entry hole in the area of the
- cowlick, although the autopsists, Doctors Humes and Boswell, told
- the committee of doctors at the House of Representatives that
- they denied .... He said: I defy you to see this hole here where
- you say it is; that this is not a hole. It's something else. And
- it was four inches -- as the Clark Panel found in 1968 -- from
- where that entry hole was placed in the autopsy report by Doctor
- Humes and Doctor Boswell. It was four inches above it. Then,
- showing the face missing in the X-rays and not showing Earl
- Warren the photographs that showed the President's face intact
- made him think that his face was blown away. And that's what we
- see in the Zapruder film. And I believe that that's animated.
-
- GARY NULL:
- Okay, let's go to some specific references. I'm looking now at a
- photograph of John Kennedy. It's called "the stare of death"
- photograph. And I'd like for you to talk about the reference
- black triangle that appears on the right upper forehead of
- Kennedy in this photograph.
-
- HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
- Yes, if you have a clear print of that in the negative, in the
- negative there is no light whatsoever that comes through that
- triangle. It's much clearer in a clear print. In my book, we were
- able to do the best possible reproductions, but, of course,
- they're screened and it's not that clear. But in a comparable
- right profile photograph, which we publish there, you can see
- what has been covered up. And they're from two DIFFERENT sets of
- photographs. One, with the reference black triangle is known as
- "the Fox set of photographs" which came into the possession of
- Mark Crouch, who was a friend of the Secret Service man, James K.
- Fox, who took the rolls of film from Bethesda Naval Hospital over
- to be developed in the Navy labs. The other set of photographs,
- which were in the possession of Robert Groden, show that there is
- a major laceration extending into the forehead of the President.
- This was NOT seen in Dallas, but two of the autopsy doctors did
- describe this laceration to me. They brought it up. I did not
- bring it up. And they told me about the laceration going a half
- an inch into the forehead above the right eye. That's where that
- reference black triangle is. What the reasons were for covering
- it up in some of those photographs are not clear to me. I can't
- answer that question. All I know is that they conflict with each
- other -- these two different pictures, as do many of the
- photographs conflict with each other.
-
- GARY NULL:
- Also, it's very clear that the whole right side of the head is
- blackened out, and only the ear is visible. That is CLEARLY
- retouching.
-
- HARRISON LIVINGSTONE:
- That's it. And the whole back of the head, extending around
- behind to the right ear was missing. And a major part of my
- research was to try to resolve the puzzles of the medical
- evidence. Exactly what did the wounds look like? I was able to
- determine -- by having the doctors and the witnesses at the
- autopsy and in Dallas draw on mannequin heads -- exactly where
- the bone defect was and how much scalp was missing. And they are
- identical. The wound was not altered, but there was a large hole
- that went all the way around to the side of the head. The autopsy
- report is accurate in that respect, but the problem was that
- there was sort of a flap of scalp that was badly macerated and it
- did have an egg-shaped-sized hole through it. But it could not
- possibly cover up all of the missing bone that was underneath
- there. And this caused a lot of confusion among engineers and
- accountants and other people with that mindset who do this
- research, because they can't semantically separate out the
- issues, for instance, between alteration and tampering, or
- between laceration and incision. A lot of the confusion in the
- case (in the medical evidence) is semantic, so I was able to
- determine that the body was not altered. It may have been
- tampered with, but even that doesn't appear to have been
- necessary when all they really had to do was to fake the
- photographs and flash them at Earl Warren who put them aside
- immediately because of their gore.
- (to be continued)
- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
-
- If you agree that this story deserves broad public attention, please
- assist in disseminating it by posting it to other bulletin boards
- and by posting hardcopies in public places, both on and off campus.
- As evidence accrues concerning the corporate mass media's thirty-year
- cover-up of the corporate CIA's coup d'etat against the People of
- the United States, the necessity of citizen reportage becomes
- ever more striking.
-
- John DiNardo
-