home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!rich
- From: New Liberation News Service <nlns@igc.apc.org>
- Subject: THIS MONTH IN HISTORY: 9/25/69...
- Message-ID: <1992Sep7.201625.6459@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Originator: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Organization: ?
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 20:16:25 GMT
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Lines: 68
-
- THIS MONTH IN HISTORY: September 25, 1969
-
- from LIBERATION News Service #197
-
- Nixon Withdrawals: Keeping the War Awar From Home
- LIBERATION News Service
-
- WASHINGTON, D.C. (LNS)--Nixon and his friends just can't take to
- the idea of losing a war (any more than Johnson or Kennedy could
- before him). But in order to prosecute the war they have to
- disarm the loud opposition at home.
- So they have a plan for passification on the domestic front:
- The name of the plan is "withdrawal" and the way it works is,
- bring home 25,000 or 60,000 troops (making sure that draft calls
- are high enough to offset this for the time being), make a big
- deal about it, win the help of the obliging media, and gradually
- reduce the number of GIs to the point where its enough to keep up
- the level of aggression, without attracting too much attention.
- In the words of our military officials, "We are going to reduce
- the fighting to a level the American public will tolerate for a
- long pull."
- Nixon is trying it out again. But it didn't fool the North
- Vietnamese, or the PRG, and it's not likely to fool too many
- Americans.
- There seems to be some disagreement among ruling class
- strategists, however. None of them wants to lose the war, but
- apparently some of them realize they might already have. Cyrus
- Vance, from back in the Johnson days of the Paris talks, outlined
- his strategy for face-saving-despite-defeat-ism in the N.Y. Times
- Sunday Magazine recently. He advocates a "stand-still cease-fire"
- where the country would be divided up into many small regions
- controlled either by the NLF, Saigon or some ethnic or regional
- minority.
- These regions would then be represented in a national
- legislature where they could fight it out peacefully.
- What's new about this is that Vance recognizes that the PRG
- has already gained the allegiance of a large part of South
- Vietnam (although he probably doesn't realize how much). He
- recognizes the liberated zones as political, not just military,
- entities.
- But Vance still has his heart in the same place. His plan
- would maintain U.S. imperialist interests in full force in
- Southeast Asia. It would also give the Saigon government full
- legitimacy, and would allow the U.S. military time to fully
- refurbish itself before breaking the cease-fire.
- These plans won't work. The PRG will obviously not accept a
- plan like Vance's, and there's no reason to think that the people
- of Vietnam couldn't handle 200,000 U.S. troops if they can handle
- 500,000 of them.
- Furthermore, GIs are rebelling. In addition to a continually
- growing number of anti-war movements on American Army bases, the
- incidents of companies refusing to fight in Vietnam or turning
- their guns on their officers is also growing. There's no reason
- to think that they'll want to fight any more when the number of
- troops is smaller, their positions more vulnerable, than they do
- now.
- So Nixon and his friends have a little problem on their
- hands.
- Where do they draw the line and fight in defense of their
- empire? Laos? Thailand? Korea? The Philippines? Pearl Harbor?
- Oakland? And who will they get to do their fighting for them?
-
- ----------------------------- 30 ---------------------------
-
- Dutifully transcribed by humble NLNS staffer Phillip Zerbo.
- Comments, suggestions and requests welcome: <nlns>,
- <nlns@igc.apc.org>.
-
-