home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
- Path: sparky!uunet!kithrup!sef
- From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
- Subject: Re: "official" FSF position on apple
- Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 19:53:35 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Sep15.195335.3697@kithrup.COM>
- References: <1992Sep15.042744.1220@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <ROSSINI.92Sep15102354@biosun4.harvard.edu> <1992Sep15.185227.2692@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1992Sep15.185227.2692@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) writes:
- >Why _does_ the FSF allow its software to be ported to Apple machines, even if
- >it refuses to do so itself?
-
- Because that would be contrary to Stallman's (and, therefore, the FSF's)
- goals, which are to make all software freely distributiable. To further
- that goal, the FSF has a suite of programs which can be distributed freely
- (requiring only that the source be made available if binaries are
- distributed), and few restrictions on what can be done with it. Placing a
- restriction like that on it would be against Stallman's goals and desires.
-
- He just doesn't want to help Apple (or Lotus, for that matter) at all. If
- someone else wants to, there is nothing he can really do, short of
- persuading that person that what (s)he is doing is wrong.
-
- Just because the software is freely distributable doesn't mean that any and
- all changes you make to it are going to be merged back into the FSF's
- versions. And the FSF has chosen to not accept any Apple-dependent changes.
-
- Why is that such a hard concept to grasp?
-
- --
- Sean Eric Fagan | "You can't get lost in one room, no matter how
- sef@kithrup.COM | little effort you make to learn your way around."
- -----------------+ -- William E Davidsen (william@crd.GE.COM)
- Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.
-