home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky gnu.misc.discuss:2981 comp.org.eff.talk:5767 comp.unix.bsd:5454 comp.os.mach:1227 misc.int-property:948 alt.suit.att-bsdi:281
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usc!rpi!utcsri!torn!utzoo!utdoe!torag!zooid!ron
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.org.eff.talk,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach,misc.int-property,alt.suit.att-bsdi
- Subject: Re: Are you sure UNIX is a trade mark?
- Message-ID: <716101727.10647@zooid.guild.org>
- From: ron@zooid.guild.org (Secret Mud)
- Date: 10 Sep 92 05:08:47 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- From: bruner@sp15.csrd.uiuc.edu (John Bruner)
- >I don't understand the glee that some have expressed in finding a
- >mention of "Berkeley UNIX" in a SVR4 manual. This has no effect upon
- >the trademark status of the term "UNIX", especially because I would be
- >willing to bet that the manual explicitly points out the trademark
- >status of "UNIX" in at least one place.
- >
- >One cannot assert that a trademark has lost its protected status just
- >because it is a widely-recognized name. "Kleenex" is almost certainly
- >a more widely-recognized name than "UNIX", but it is still a
- >registered trademark of Kimberly-Clark.
- >--
-
- I think people would have a better shot at removing the trademark protection
- from IBM. After all, an awful lot of people with any old PC compatable will
- say that they have an "IBM". (Puzzling, since most IBM computers, these days,
- are not very compatable at all.)
-
- Kleenex (and Xerox) may be holding on for the moment--but only by sternly
- policing any generic usage of their trademark. A large number of common words
- used to be trademarked, but lost that protection when they entered into
- common usage for any similar generic product: Dry Ice, Escalator, Brassiere,
- mimeograph, and zipper--all of these used to be trademarked names.
-