home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky gnu.misc.discuss:2954 comp.org.eff.talk:5734 comp.unix.bsd:5343 comp.os.mach:1204
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!news
- From: brtmac@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu (Brett McCoy)
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.org.eff.talk,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach
- Subject: Re: Are you sure UNIX is a trade mark?
- Date: 8 Sep 1992 19:25:02 -0500
- Organization: Kansas State University
- Lines: 17
- Distribution: inet
- Message-ID: <18jg8uINN888@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu>
- References: <1992Sep2.220141.17026@nntp.hut.fi>
- <1992Sep4.234429.18294@newsgate.sps.mot.com> <Bu5DBu.IA6@rahul.net>
- <1992Sep8.135040.5243@pegasus.com>
- <BRUNER.92Sep8172455@sp15.csrd.uiuc.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: maverick.ksu.ksu.edu
- In-reply-to: bruner@sp15.csrd.uiuc.edu's message of 8 Sep 92 17:24:55
-
- In article <BRUNER.92Sep8172455@sp15.csrd.uiuc.edu> bruner@sp15.csrd.uiuc.edu (John Bruner) writes:
-
- >One cannot assert that a trademark has lost its protected status just
- >because it is a widely-recognized name. "Kleenex" is almost certainly
- >a more widely-recognized name than "UNIX", but it is still a
- >registered trademark of Kimberly-Clark.
-
- You can to do exactly that. Once a name become used to refer to a
- generic product, and not a specific brand, the trademark is lost.
- Kleenex, if it hasn't already happened, will cease to become a
- trademark when the current term (for lack of a better word) runs
- out. The same is likely to happen to Xerox, and has happened for
- many other "brands". If you'd like I can post an entire list of
- trademarks that have lost trademark status due to common usage.
-
- ++Brett;
-
-