home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf.sub.org!flatlin!bad
- From: bad@flatlin.ka.sub.org (Christoph Badura)
- Subject: Re: is there a 'df' bug with ufs?
- Organization: Guru Systems/Funware Department
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 18:05:12 GMT
- Message-ID: <BuJ3Kp.7Bo@flatlin.ka.sub.org>
- References: <1992Sep9.074452.166@mcopn3.dseg.ti.com>
- Lines: 15
-
- In <1992Sep9.074452.166@mcopn3.dseg.ti.com> bmyers@mcopn3.dseg.ti.com writes:
- >[About ufs problems]
- >right now, I see when I do a 'df' command, that I have over 950,000 blocks
- >free, but less than 6000 files.
-
- There is a bug in the SVR4 ufs mkfs command. It incorrectly calculates
- the parameter that controls inode allocation for large file system.
-
- Run "mkfs -F ufs -m /u1" and look at the parameters. Then rerun mkfs
- on the filesystem by hand.
-
- --
- Christoph Badura --- bad@flatlin.ka.sub.org
-
- ISO? Nicht immer, aber immer M-vfter.
-