home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20 / NN_1992_20.iso / spool / comp / unix / question / 10935 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-09-10  |  883 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uwm.edu!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!nntpserver!stevew
  2. From: stevew@sisters.cs.uoregon.edu (Stephen M. Wynne)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
  4. Subject: Alternative SysV3 Manpaths? (Was: backward MANPATH ?)
  5. Message-ID: <STEVEW.92Sep10162403@sisters.cs.uoregon.edu>
  6. Date: 11 Sep 92 00:24:03 GMT
  7. Article-I.D.: sisters.STEVEW.92Sep10162403
  8. References: <1992Sep9.191751.22333@eng.ufl.edu> <1992Sep10.010200.12873@eng.ufl.edu>
  9.     <5448@unixhub.SLAC.Stanford.EDU>
  10. Sender: news@cs.uoregon.edu (Netnews Owner)
  11. Followup-To: comp.unix.questions
  12. Organization: CS Dept, University of Oregon
  13. Lines: 7
  14. In-Reply-To: alhy@unixhub.slac.stanford.edu's message of 10 Sep 92 17:19:45 GMT
  15.  
  16. Speaking of MANPATH, can SysVR3 (dynix/ptx) be more flexible than
  17. looking in /usr/catman/manX for catenated files, or am I just
  18. dreaming?
  19.  
  20. Thanks,
  21.  
  22. STEVE
  23.