home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!cs.weber.edu!terry
- From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Subject: Re: [386BSD] cc1 fatal error & more!
- Message-ID: <1992Sep11.151505.24561@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
- Date: 11 Sep 92 15:15:05 GMT
- References: <6703@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> <1992Sep11.012623.14965@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <BuEAx4.JIq@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
- Sender: news@fcom.cc.utah.edu
- Organization: Weber State University (Ogden, UT)
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <BuEAx4.JIq@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> rahnds@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Dale Rahn) writes:
- >is it possible that the -O option of gcc uses too much memory
- >(i have 8M real, 16M swap but have X386 running)
- >or could there be a problem with gcc.
-
- It depends on which X you are running. Is your server binary the 11 Meg or
- the 1 Meg flavor?
-
- Seriously, since you have the test bed all set up ;-), try not running X
- and redoing the compile. I suspect that 24 Meg is too teeny to run the big
- version of X and compile at the same time (considering the 11 Meg is the
- size of the image without stack or locally allocated memory).
-
-
- Terry Lambert
- terry_lambert@gateway.novell.com
- terry@icarus.weber.edu
- ---
- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
- or previous employers.
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- "I have an 8 user poetic license" - me
- Get the 386bsd FAQ from agate.berkeley.edu:/pub/386BSD/386bsd-0.1/unofficial
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-