home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Path: sparky!uunet!kithrup!sef
- From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
- Subject: Re: 386BSD #!/bin/csh
- Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 04:50:48 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Sep10.045048.6332@kithrup.COM>
- References: <TRI.92Sep9011202@supergirl.hut.fi> <1992Sep9.171327.20998@gateway.novell.com>
- Lines: 22
-
- (`comp' is not a valid Distribution. By putting 'Distribution: comp' in the
- header, you have caused a growing number of sites around the world to just
- drop your article on the floor. Is that what you wanted?)
-
- In article <1992Sep9.171327.20998@gateway.novell.com> terry@thisbe.Eng.Sandy.Novell.COM (Terry Lambert) writes:
- >Instead of:
- > #!/bin/sh
- >use:
- > :
- > #
-
- Alternatively, and I personally think this is "better," modify the exec*
- source code to, if the system call fails, open up the file in question and
- to the processing itself, instead of relying on the kernel.
-
- Just a thought...
-
- --
- Sean Eric Fagan | "You can't get lost in one room, no matter how
- sef@kithrup.COM | little effort you make to learn your way around."
- -----------------+ -- William E Davidsen (william@crd.GE.COM)
- Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.
-