home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!terra2!osynw
- From: osynw@terra2.oscs.montana.edu (Nathan Williams)
- Subject: Project List for 386BSD 9/92
- Message-ID: <1992Sep7.230241.19404@coe.montana.edu>
- Summary: one person's opinion
- Keywords: patience is a good thing
- Sender: osynw@terra.oscs.montana.edu
- Organization: Montana State University
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 23:02:41 GMT
- Lines: 74
-
- Here are some things I think are required to make 386BSD more stable.
-
- Some are being worked on, some are not.
-
-
- 1) The disk drivers need to be updated.
- There have been so many patches and bugs to the SCSI and other
- disk drivers, that I didn't know where to start. Could someone
- (Bill or Lynne) post their current version of the as.c, wd.c,
- asboot, wdboot drivers so that we can start fresh again.
- * If you think you have a good version of the driver with most of the
- necessary patches, send me email and I'll include it in the bug report.
-
- [I believe that there is being work done on the SCSI driver, and
- tih@barsoom.mhh.no has a pretty good wd driver]
-
-
- 2) Install needs some work.
- Install does a great job, and it was wonderful for getting some
- people started, but #1, the swap space isn't big enough, and
- #2, since it doesn't explain what it does, people can't put
- 386BSD on their machines if install doesn't work.
- I think an install document something akin to what Chris D. did
- when 386BSD was first released would be nice. A little more
- explanation as to what is being done. A layman's explanation of
- disklabel, newfs, MBR's, and all that fun stuff would make installing
- 386BSD less of a black art and more understandable to the new
- users.
-
- 3) A good working com driver. Since Chris's version has a copyright
- on it, would someone who has a good version with the spl code
- fixed in it volunteer their version for inclusion.
-
- 4) We need good copies of
- a) init.c - I have at least three patches, and so should I
- apply all three patches and call that version the
- 'blessed' version, or use Mark Tinguely version from
- 0.0 instead.
- b) kern_execve.c - Again, this one has had lots of patches
- here and there. The 0.1 version didn't have much
- functionality, though the final 0.0 version did. Should
- we make one a 'blessed' version?
- c) other mulitple patched files.
-
- 5) Find out why 386BSD will not boot on certain kinds of hardward.
- I would hope that by fixing 1 and documenting 2, we
- could eliminate many of the problems that people are
- having booting up 386BSD 0.1.
-
- 6) Any/all kinds of documentation on the changes between 4.3 - 4.4
- BSD. There is some documentation included in the distribution
- in the etc(??) group, but it's pretty scarce and deals mostly
- with the VAX.
-
-
- I hope that the group could help the Jolitz out by taking the best version
- of what we have (assuming that they don't violate the BSD standard), and
- make them the unofficial user's version. That way, the more important
- jobs can be worked on by those who have better knowledge of them.
- (Re-writing the paging routines, ...)
-
- Anyhow, these are my opinions on what needs to be done for
- all/most users to be helped out. Tell me what you think, if
- you agree/disagree, etc.
-
- There are more things that should be done, but *I* think that if
- we could fix these particular problems, many people would benefit.
-
-
- Nate
- --
- osynw@terra.oscs.montana.edu | A hacker w/out a home. Anyone interested
- work: (406) 994-5991 | in a used Sys. Admin., with alot of
- home: (406) 586-0579 | good hacks left?
-