home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ucselx!crash!nosc!pages!bruce
- From: bruce@pages.com(Bruce Henderson)
- Subject: Re: Spreadsheets (was Mesa vs. Appsoft)
- Message-ID: <1992Sep13.210115.1700@pages.com>
- Sender: bruce@pages.com
- Organization: Banzai Research Institute
- References: <716000430.F00004@blkcat.UUCP>
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 21:01:15 GMT
- Lines: 35
-
-
- In comp.sys.next.misc article <716000430.F00004@blkcat.UUCP>
- David.Gursky@p394.f70.n109.z1.fidonet.org (David Gursky) wrote:
- > I'll throw my two cents in to this debate. The one thing missing from
- > everyone's spreadsheet application is compatibility with Excel*. Yes, it's
- very
-
- [...]
-
- > * What is Excel compatibility? It is the ability to interpret correctly a
- > complete set of Excel features in an Excel spreadsheet, including references
- to
- > Macros, external documents (i.e. charts), formulas, the whole shebang.
-
- Well,
-
- one thing that may stand in your way is the complexity of the .biff format.
- For those of you who just said "What is biff" it is the excel file format.
- You see, unlike wks, or SYLK, biff is not a file format that was meant to be
- read by anything other than Excel. It more or less consists of a partial dump
- of their VM memory system (on the Mac and Windows) to disk. Therefore,
- interpreting it is no small task.
-
- When I was at Ashton-Tate, PowerStep's (now Appsoft Solution) sister product
- (FullImpact on the Mac) could read Excel files up to 3.0. And it was a small
- miracle.
-
- If you really wanted to be of service to the Spreadsheet comunity, you could
- write a 3.0 filter service that cranked .biff to one of the 1-2-3 formats, wich
- are the ones that they all support.
-
- So I agree that Excel file format from 4.0 or better (now the current rev) is
- highly desireable, it is not going to be easy.
-
- Bruce
-