home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!shapetc!usenet
- From: koelman@cuby.stc.nl (Ton Koelman)
- Subject: Re: Where are the Philips monitors built?
- Message-ID: <1992Sep7.110647.13184@stc.nato.int>
- Sender: usenet@stc.nato.int (USENET messages)
- Reply-To: koelman@stc.nato.int
- Organization: SHAPE Technical Centre, NL
- References: <1992Sep5.232230.25340@cube.handheld.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 11:06:47 GMT
- Lines: 39
-
- In article <1992Sep5.232230.25340@cube.handheld.com> jmd@cube.handheld.com
- (Jim De Arras) writes:
- > In article <1992Sep5.163800.18684@tamsun.tamu.edu> lusty@lusty.tamu.edu
- (Lusty
- > Wench) writes:
- > > In article <1992Aug30.153807.17981@cube.handheld.com>
- jmd@cube.handheld.com
- > (Jim De Arras) writes:
- > > >
- > > >He can't do anything about it, Philips TV's look just as bad. It's
- an issue
- > of
- > > >phosphers. Sony has the best, the best red in specific.
- > > >
- > > >Jim
- > >
- > > Talk about shooting yourself in the foot. Here you have a guy in
- > > management who is not only open to suggestions but who is even
- > > *anxious* to hear specific ways in which they can improve their
- > > product, and all you can do is say "forget it, you don't stand a
- > > chance". I guess it's more fun to complain about why something
- > > is a piece of junk than it is to offer constructive suggestions
- > > on how it can be made better.
- > >
- > >
- > > Lusty Wench
- >
- > Perhaps I was too abrupt in my reply. The difference between Sony and
- Philips'
- > colo[u]r CRTs is historic, and a matter of pride to BOTH companies.
- Philips
- > thinks their phospers look better than Sony's.
-
- I see! Philips employees are color blind....
-
- --
- Ton Koelman e-mail: koelman@stc.nato.int (NeXT Mail Welcome!)
- SHAPE Technical Centre, P.O. Box 174, 2501 CD The Hague
- The Netherlands (voice: 31-70-3142429, fax: 31-70-3142111)
-