home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsc!cbfsb!cbnewsb.cb.att.com!mbb
- From: mbb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (martin.brilliant)
- Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++
- Message-ID: <1992Sep15.023425.20744@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
- Sender: news@cbfsb.cb.att.com
- Organization: AT&T
- References: <1992Sep14.215452.24171@mksol.dseg.ti.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 02:34:25 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- From article <1992Sep14.215452.24171@mksol.dseg.ti.com>, by mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539):
- > In <1992Sep11.034115.21253@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mbb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (martin.brilliant) writes:
- > [ about confusion about Turbo C++ vs. Borland C++, particuarly with regard
- to the stand-alone debugger ]
- >
- > What version is that User's Guide you have? I have one like that,
- > too, that shipped with the Turbo C++ 1.0 PROFESSIONAL package (but the
- > debugger is Turbo Debugger 2.0). This is the package that is called
- > BORLAND C++ 3.1, in its current incarnation.
- >
- > [Presumably the Turbo Pascal line has a debugger -- do they share the
- > same one? In fact, they may still call it Turbo Debugger when it
- > ships with the Borland C++ bundle -- my docs for that are at home, and
- > I never paid any attention before.]
-
- I'm not confused any more. Apparently the Turbo C++ v1.0 Professional
- I have is the last of its kind under that name.
-
- The Debugger I have signs on as version 2.0. The manual says it's for
- C, Pascal, and assembler, and supports C++, and the user interface is
- consistent with that. I've never actually used it, though. The
- package as I got it (used) included manuals for both Debugger (1.0)
- and Debugger 2.0; I thought that was a mistake.
-
- Marty
- marty@hoqaa.att.com hoqaa!marty
- Martin B. Brilliant (Winnertech Corporation)
-