home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!vax5.cit.cornell.edu!n65j
- From: n65j@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
- Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++
- Message-ID: <1992Sep11.181848.14857@vax5.cit.cornell.edu>
- Date: 11 Sep 92 18:18:48 EDT
- References: <1992Sep8.170415.24800@bluemtn.COM> <1992Sep10.150327.12901@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
- Distribution: comp
- Organization: Cornell University
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Sep10.150327.12901@cbfsb.cb.att.com>,
- mbb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (martin.brilliant) writes:
- > From article <1992Sep8.170415.24800@bluemtn.COM>, by gregp@bluemtn.COM (Greg Philmon):
- >> ....
- >> BC includes more powerful, standalone tools for developing, such as the
- >> excellent Turbo Debugger, profiler, etc. BC is an optimizing (sp?) compiler,
- >> TC is not.
- >
- > I'm confused. Maybe that only applies to the current release. I bought
- > a used copy of Turbo C++ 1.0 which includes debugger, profiles, and
- > assembler, and I think it has optimization in the compiler. I know
- > it's "Turbo," not "Borland," because I have to change "bcc" to "tcc"
- > in makefiles.
- >
- > Marty
- > marty@hoqaa.att.com hoqaa!marty
- > Martin B. Brilliant (Winnertech Corporation)
-