home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!west.West.Sun.COM!news2me.ebay.sun.com!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!texsun!exucom.exu.ericsson.se!news
- From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (exuptr@exu.ericsson.se)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
- Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++
- Message-ID: <exuptr.498.716164726@exu.ericsson.se>
- Date: 10 Sep 92 22:38:46 GMT
- References: <18fqjgINNaio@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> <1992Sep10.182752.18566@mksol.dseg.ti.com>
- Sender: news@exu.ericsson.se
- Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc.
- Lines: 25
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pc254167.exu.ericsson.se
-
- In article <1992Sep10.182752.18566@mksol.dseg.ti.com> mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539) writes:
- >In <18fqjgINNaio@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> gude@uniwa.uwa.edu.au (David J W Emrich) writes:
-
- >>I'm getting confused, Borland writes all the Turbo products, so isn't
- >>Turbo C++ the same thing as Borland C++?
-
- >Yes, Borland writes all the Turbo products, and no, Turbo C++ isn't
- >the same thing as Borland C++.
-
- >Borland C++ is the 'professional' package. It includes extra
- >optimization, extra debugging, a profiler, works both under Windows
- >and on DOS to produce either Windows or DOS executables, etc. LOTS of
- >differences, many of which I'm probably not even aware of.
-
- Hi Fred!
-
- One potentially important difference is that Borland C++ compiler has better
- optimization than the Turbo C++.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- "This must be Thursday. I never could get the hang of Thursdays"
- - Douglas Adams
- - Patrick Taylor (Arthur Dent)
- Ericsson Network Systems
- exuptr@exu.ericsson.se "Don't let the .se fool you"
- or exuptr@ZGNews.Lonestar.Org, exu.exuptr@memo.ericsson.se
-