home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20 / NN_1992_20.iso / spool / comp / sys / ibm / pc / hardware / 24145 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-09-13  |  1.2 KB  |  34 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!infonode!bbrown
  3. From: bbrown@infonode.ingr.com (Bailey Brown)
  4. Subject: Re: Ultra Graphics Pro Release Date ???????
  5. Message-ID: <1992Sep13.182508.7841@infonode.ingr.com>
  6. Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, AL.
  7. References: <54830012@acf3.NYU.EDU> <1992Sep13.013042.28770@bnr.ca>
  8. Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 18:25:08 GMT
  9. Lines: 23
  10.  
  11. tracyb@bnr.ca (Tracy Blomquist) writes:
  12.  
  13. >Daniel Reznick (reznick@acf3.NYU.EDU) wrote:
  14. >: How does the Ultra Graphics Pro compare with the normal Ultra Graphics
  15. >: card?
  16. >: 
  17. >: Daniel Reznick
  18. >: reznick@acf3.nyu.edu
  19.  
  20. >Ultra = Approx 10 Mpixels/sec Winmark, max 256 colours, max NI res
  21. >        is 1024 x 768 (1280x1024 Interlaced, but who wants it?!)
  22.  
  23. >Pro   = Approx 25 Mpixels/sec Winmark, 16.7 million colours @ 640x480,
  24. >        65000 colours @ 800x600 and 1024x768, 256 colours @ 1280x1024.
  25. >        ALL NI! (with a 1280x1024 refresh of 70+ Hz !)  Amazing!
  26.  
  27. I thought the new ultras did 800x600x16.7M.  At least this is
  28. what ATI's ad claimed.
  29.  
  30. ------------
  31. Bailey Brown                               "Above all else, confusion reigns."
  32. Intergraph Corporation                                  
  33. bbrown@casca.b11.ingr.com                              Procol Harum
  34.