home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!nic.unh.edu!kepler.unh.edu!pss1
- From: pss1@kepler.unh.edu (Paul S Secinaro)
- Subject: Re: Gateway CS1024NI = (!=) Mag Monitor
- Message-ID: <1992Sep9.120407.11155@newshost.unh.edu>
- Sender: news@newshost.unh.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: University of New Hampshire - Durham, NH
- References: <1992Sep5.110215.978@sugra.uucp> <1992Sep6.213158.14626@news.acns.nwu.edu> <1992Sep9.010220.3250@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 12:04:07 GMT
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <1992Sep9.010220.3250@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mrosen@nyx.cs.du.edu (Michael Rosen) writes:
-
- >>I too bought the CS1024 in 1990. I was told by Gateway that it was the same
- >>as the MAG monitor. I also saw in one or two reviews that Gateway monitors
- >>were made by Tatung.
- >> It seems to me that people in this thread have been assuming that MAG
- >>actually manufactures the monitors. I see no reason to believe that this is
- >>true. It could very likely be the case that MAG and Gateway monitors come
- >
- >No, I'm pretty certain that MAG makes Gateway's monitors. For one,
- >when I wrote gateway@aol.com, Cynthia Lloyd told me that they were
- >having problems with the monitors and were working with MAG to fix the
- >problem. Second, I think their literature they send out mentions MAG,
- >but I don't have it in front of me to check.
- >
-
- I think there are two different monitors at issue here. One is the
- older CS1024I, which is interlaced at the 1024x768 resolution. The
- other is the CS1024NI, which does non-interlaced 60Hz 1024x768. We
- have both models in the lab. As far as I can tell, the CS1024I looks
- exactly like pictures of Tatung monitors I've seen in magazines. I'm
- not sure if Gateway sells this monitor anymore, though.
-
- Paul
-
- --
- Paul Secinaro
- pss1@kepler.unh.edu
- Synthetic Vision and Pattern Analysis Laboratory
- UNH Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
-