home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!stanford.edu!rutgers!fdurt1.fdu.edu!wisdom.bubble.org!sugra!ken
- From: ken@sugra.uucp (Kenneth Ng)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Subject: Re: Gateway CS1024NI = (!=) Mag Monitor
- Message-ID: <1992Sep5.110215.978@sugra.uucp>
- Date: 5 Sep 92 11:02:15 GMT
- References: <1992Sep02.230434.15684@gibdo.engr.washington.edu: <1992Sep3.020337.10013@panix.com>
- Organization: Private Computer, Totowa NJ
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1992Sep3.020337.10013@panix.com:, spira@panix.com (Greg Spira) writes:
- : In article <1992Sep02.230434.15684@gibdo.engr.washington.edu> bobk@gibdo.engr.washington.edu (Bob) writes:
- : >ujlh@pool.info.sunyit.edu (James Henrickson) writes:
- : >| Nope, not always. I have received mail from several people in the past
- : >| whose Crystal Scans were made by another company.
- : >ken@sugra.uucp (Kenneth Ng) writes:
- : >| I've sent mine in for repair, its Tatung.
- : > I believe you. The disturbing thing is that I talked to a Gateway sales
- : > rep yesterday and she told me *all* the CrystalScan 1572fs monitors were
- : > made by Mag.
- : Well, they all are - now.
-
- Well, my CrystalSCAN is the 1024. Maybe its the model number that makes the
- difference.
-
- --
- Kenneth Ng
- Please reply to ken@eies2.njit.edu for now.
- Apple and AT&T lawsuits: Just say NO!
-