home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.dec:4941 comp.sys.hp:10294 comp.unix.questions:10960 alt.sys.sun:3123 comp.sys.next.advocacy:2161 comp.os.os2.advocacy:5244 comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:2163
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rpi!bu.edu!Shiva.COM!world!geoff
- From: geoff@world.std.com (Geoff Collyer)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec,comp.sys.hp,comp.unix.questions,alt.sys.sun,comp.sys.next.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
- Subject: Re: net.views -- What is an "Open System"?
- Message-ID: <BuF3uI.5ox@world.std.com>
- Date: 11 Sep 92 14:20:42 GMT
- References: <BuBx63.H64@vcd.hp.com> <1992Sep10.024324.17106@decuac.dec.com>
- <BuCytz.1IG@world.std.com> <1992Sep10.145509.6695@decuac.dec.com>
- Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
- Lines: 50
-
- Let me use Marcus's comment as a jumping-off point; this is not a personal
- attack.
-
- > What makes having the hardware documented "Open"?? It seems to
- > me that you're defining an "Open System" as any system which you can
- > *FIX* yourself if you don't like what the vendor's done with it. Some
- > of us prefer to just change vendors.
-
- I'm a system programmer, so that biases my opinions. I certainly want
- to be able to fix broken software. I also want the option of not
- running the vendor's software; not all of us are buying Application
- Delivery Vehicles. Changing vendors would be a good idea if there were
- any vendors not currently selling ADVs (I think MIPS was the last,
- though possibly HP still qualifies).
-
- But my real objection to the abuse of the term "open system" has less
- to do with computing than with linguistic abuse. Computing is
- notorious for linguistic abuse and content-free buzzwords, but this
- case is pretty astonishing even by the lax standards of computing.
- Here we have two simple English words. "System" of course became
- content-free years ago and now means little more than "a bag of stuff"
- (or as Stan Kelly-Bootle puts it in The Devil's DP Dictionary, "any old
- ratbag of incompatible components"). The word "open" has all sorts of
- warm fuzzy connotations of goodness (not counting Sun's innovation of
- Open Security, which culminated in the 386i: `pahss-words? we don't
- need no steenkin' pahss-words.'), which vendors clearly want to tap,
- yet it actually has denotations, notably "not closed or blocked up or
- sealed or locked", "not covered or concealed or restricted" and "frank,
- communicative" (The Oxford Paperback Dictionary). I am deeply and
- negatively impressed that Sun or SGI can call their systems "open", wth
- straight faces, when they don't offer anything comparable to the
- Digital PDP-11/70 Processor Handbook, which described the instruction
- set, addressing and memory management unit, memory system, floating
- point processor, I/O controllers, console, kernel memory map including
- device addresses, and device register bit layouts, in sufficient detail
- to implement an operating system when read in conjunction with the
- Peripherals Handbook, and without "open system" hype, and all in only
- 276 pages.
-
- But perhaps I am being naive and old-fashioned and should look instead
- at the other meanings of "open": "admitting visitors or customers",
- "with wide spaces between solid parts", and "not yet settled or
- decided" (The Oxford Paperback Dictionary again).
-
- ``Kiss the ladies, shake hands with the fellows,
- and it's Open For Business like a cheap bordello'' - Bruce Cockburn
- --
- Geoff Collyer world.std.com!geoff, uunet.uu.net!geoff
-
- ``Leave the evil grasping to us.'' - A. L. Arms, UNIX licensing, WECo.
-