home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!warwick!dcs.warwick.ac.uk!sunserver1.aston.ac.uk!uhura!wrighttj
- From: wrighttj@uhura.aston.ac.uk (Auntie Tim)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
- Subject: Re: Can Falcon do that?
- Message-ID: <1992Sep15.122419.13085@aston.ac.uk>
- Date: 15 Sep 92 12:24:19 GMT
- References: <1992Sep14.140529.15200@cs.ruu.nl>
- Sender: usenet@aston.ac.uk (Usenet administrator)
- Organization: Aston University
- Lines: 28
- Nntp-Posting-Host: uhura
-
- avgroeni@cs.ruu.nl (Annius Groenink) writes:
- : In <QAZ6D3S@gwdu03.gwdg.de> marsh@gwdgv1.gwdg.de writes:
- : >
- : >P.S. Has anyone ever compared Cubase ST and Cubase Windows? I have the
- : >impression that Cubase Windows on 33MHz 386 PC with SVGA is much much
- : >less capable than Cubase ST on my good old 8Mhz 1040STFM concerning
- : >especially realtime related functions.
- :
- : Hey, of course! What is it that makes you even try to compare an
- : Atari to and MSDOS machine? Everybody knows GEM an an 8Mhz ST
- : runs better than MS Windows on perhaps even a 486.
- :
- : --
- : ________________________________________________________
- : Annius Groenink|undergraduate student
- : Laan van Borgele 24|maths/computer science at the
- : 7415 DJ Deventer|University of Utrecht, Holland.
-
- I detect a hint of sarcasm here? The point being made was that
- _Cubase_Windows_ was less capable than ST Cubase- not particularly
- surpising, given that ST Cubase has been around three years longer,
- and has several features that Cubase Windows doesn't. (Can't
- remember exactly what- there's a thread on rec.music.synth and
- rec.music.makers about this at the moment; I'll look it up if you're
- really interested).
- --
- Tim Wright. \ Real Life sucks
- wrighttj@cs.aston.ac.uk \ losers dry.
-