home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.atari.st:13667 rec.audio:12410 sci.skeptic:16325
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!payner
- From: payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st,rec.audio,sci.skeptic
- Subject: Re: sampling and human hearing range (was Re: (none))
- Message-ID: <+qwn34l.payner@netcom.com>
- Date: 12 Sep 92 14:45:39 GMT
- References: <BuG1wq.85E@world.std.com> <JT0yqB3w165w@tsoft.sf-bay.org>
- Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <JT0yqB3w165w@tsoft.sf-bay.org> bbs.ruscal@tsoft.sf-bay.org (Russel Mar) writes:
-
- >=======================
- >Having used a Hybrid Arts (R.I.P.) ADAP sampler, I can tell you that the
- >accepted minimum requirement is to sample at 2x the max. freq. you want
- >to reproduce/record. If you are baffled, look up the Nyquist Theorem;
- >CD's sample at 44.1k and DAT at 48kHz for this reason also.
-
- DATS sample at 48KHZ so that one cannot make a direct digital copy from
- CD's to DATs.
-
- >--
- >Russel Mar (bbs.ruscal@tsoft.sf-bay.org)
-
- Rich
-
- payner@netcom.com
-