home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!mel.dit.csiro.au!gre253
- From: gre253@mis.csiro.au (Steven Green)
- Subject: Re: CBM Discusses Future Amigas
- Message-ID: <1992Sep15.015149.23801@mel.dit.csiro.au>
- Sender: news@mel.dit.csiro.au
- Organization: CSIRO ITS
- References: <1992Sep13.161833.8545@spartan.ac.BrockU.CA> <AHANSFOR.92Sep14132853@wpi.wpi.edu> <1992Sep14.171132.1@sevmsa.cs.msstate.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 01:51:49 GMT
- Lines: 33
-
- In article <1992Sep14.171132.1@sevmsa.cs.msstate.edu> gowen@sevmsa.cs.msstate.edu writes:
- >In article <AHANSFOR.92Sep14132853@wpi.wpi.edu>, ahansfor@wpi.wpi.edu (Andrew L. Hansford) writes:
- >>>>>>> On 14 Sep 92 10:41:06 GMT, jpelkone@vipunen.hut.fi (Janne R M Pelkonen) said:
- >>
- >> jpelkone> In article <1992Sep14.180411.90091@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au> bull@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au writes:
- >>>
- >>
- >>> I have only 1 thing to say re: Amiga + RISC.
- >>>
- >>> Please, please, please, please, please, please, ALPHA!
- >>> (although MC88x00 is the more obvious option).
- >>
- >> I would rather see C= focus on getting an 060 board ASAP. Not 1.5
- >> years after everyone else does. The modular design should expedite
- >> matters.
- >>
- >> -- Andrew Hansford
- >> ahansfor@wpi.wpi.edu
- >
- >I second the above idea. The '060 should greatly increase the processing
- >power over '040-based machines. The clear choice here is to stay with the
- >'0x0-series CPUs since other CPUs will require recompiled software all the
- >way around (WorkBench, KickStart, applications, etc.).
- >
- [ Stuff about i586 deleted ]
-
- 68060 ? What ever happened to the 68050 ????
-
- --
- * Steve Green * "Hey Rocky, watch me pull a rabbit outa my hat!" *
- * Comms Group * "That trick never works" *
- * ITS Branch * "Nothin' up my sleeve - PRESTO" *
- * CSIRO Australia * "No doubt about it - I gotta get another hat" *
-