home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cbmvax!mks
- From: mks@cbmvax.commodore.com (Michael Sinz)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: Amiga 3000 - Static Column RAM's
- Message-ID: <35010@cbmvax.commodore.com>
- Date: 10 Sep 92 13:27:52 GMT
- References: <PyFqqB2w165w@blackhl.hacktic.nl> <1992Sep8.080513.28019@ifi.uio.no>
- Reply-To: mks@cbmvax.commodore.com (Michael Sinz)
- Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
- Lines: 31
-
- eriks@ifi.uio.no (Erik Saastad) writes:
- >
- >In article <PyFqqB2w165w@blackhl.hacktic.nl>, pschaap@blackhl.hacktic.nl (Peter Schaap) writes:
- >> In response to those articles posted last week in this newsgroup
- >> concerning the use of static column mode ram in the Amiga 3000, I would
- >> like to mention the following:
- >>
- >> 1. Use those chips instead of page-mode RAM's. Running your A3000 in
- >> in burst mode will make it MUCH faster.
- >
- >I thought that (at least on the older 3000's) there was a bug in ramsey. This
- >bug does so that you will have no difference in performance with static or
- >page ram. Maybe this bug is corrected on newer 3000's ?
-
- ********** AAAAARRRRRGGGGG!!!!!! (One more time...)
-
- There is no difference in RAMSEY in any production A3000 machines.
- There are only bugs in the programs that think they know how to play
- games with RAMSEY and with the users who do not listen when we (Dave
- and I) keep stating these facts.
-
- (Sorry, but this is getting to be too much! I'm sure Dave is also
- getting tired of seeing and re-answering this...)
-
- /----------------------------------------------------------------------\
- | /// Michael Sinz - Senior Amiga Systems Engineer |
- | /// Operating System Development Group |
- | /// BIX: msinz UUNET: mks@cbmvax.commodore.com |
- |\\\/// When people are free to do as they |
- | \XX/ please, they usually imitate each other. |
- \----------------------------------------------------------------------/
-