home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.graphics:6035 comp.sys.amiga.hardware:15345
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!cunews!nrcnet0!bnrgate!bcars6a8!keithh
- From: keithh@bnr.ca (Keith Hanlan)
- Subject: Re: CBM Discusses Future Amigas
- Message-ID: <1992Sep14.202637.6204@bcars6a8.bnr.ca>
- Sender: usenet@bcars6a8.bnr.ca (Use Net)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bcarh10f
- Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd., Ottawa
- References: <1992Sep13.161833.8545@spartan.ac.BrockU.CA> <1992Sep14.180411.90091@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 20:26:37 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1992Sep14.180411.90091@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au> bull@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au writes:
- > I have only 1 thing to say re: Amiga + RISC.
- >
- > Please, please, please, please, please, please, ALPHA!
- > (although MC88x00 is the more obvious option).
-
- Forget it. Alpha is little-endian. It's one thing to merely have to
- recompile. It's another to render all data unusable.
-
- I think its too bad that Alpha isn't big/little-endian switchable
- like the MIPS.
-
- No, my preference would be HP's PA-RISC or IBM's RS/6000 risc chip.
-
- Regards,
-