home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: dn@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Daniel Neades)
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 11:57:23 GMT
- Subject: Re: Borland C++ & OS/2
- Message-ID: <1992Sep15.115723.22332@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!scd.hp.com!hplextra!otter.hpl.hp.com!hpltoad!hpltoad!dn
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
- References: <1992Sep14.182102.4614@inel.gov>
- Sender: news@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Usenet News Administrator)
- Reply-To: dn@hplb.hpl.hp.com (Daniel Neades)
- Lines: 21
- Nntp-Posting-Host: krakatoa.hpl.hp.com
-
- In article <1992Sep14.182102.4614@inel.gov>, jar@inel.gov (Jeffry A
- Rich) writes:
- |>I just purchased Borland C++ ver 3.1 for dos/Windows development and
- would like to know how this product works under OS/2. Some people have
- told me that I would have to back out of OS/2 and return to dos/windows
- in order to properly use BC++, is this true|>?
- |>
- |>Also, if it does work, are there any installation 'Secrets' that need
- to be addressed?
- |>
- |>Regards,
- |> JR Rich
- |>========== long legal disclaimer follows, press n to skip ===========
-
- I've had no problems...Only thing you'd need to do is to set DPMI to ENABLED
- in the dos settings box.
-
- Oh, your long disclaimer (that is, the blank lines before it) is a real pain
- when you're trying to do a followup :-)
-
- Daniel.
-