home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu!bai
- From: bai@msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu (Dov Bai-MSI Visitor)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
- Subject: Re: 2.0 fails miserably in the PARANOIA program ( was: Division by 0 crashes OS2/2.0 )
- Message-ID: <1992Sep11.123326.22143@tc.cornell.edu>
- Date: 11 Sep 92 12:33:26 GMT
- References: <1992Sep9.225858.6523@tc.cornell.edu> <92Sep10.221229.26167@acs.ucalgary.ca>
- Sender: news@tc.cornell.edu
- Organization: /usr/local/lib/news/organization
- Lines: 26
- Nntp-Posting-Host: msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu
-
- In article <92Sep10.221229.26167@acs.ucalgary.ca> bauwens@acs.ucalgary.ca (Luc Bauwens) writes:
-
- >
- >Now about Paranoia:
- >
- >For MS Fortran 5.1, I get *exactly* the same behavior for an
- >OS/2 16 bits executable run under OS/2 2.0, for a DOS executable
- >under OS/2 2.00 and for the DOS executable under DOS 5.00. I
- >don't have a machine with OS/2 1.3 handy, so I didn't try that.
-
- Few things about the MS-Fortran experiments:
-
- 1) I found that the OBJ file produced for the DPARA.FOR is larger than
- 64K (~70k). This may cause failure of the executable. I split
- DPARA.FOR into 3 files. There are many subroutines so it is easy
- to split.
-
- 2) I found that compiling with optimization (the default) causes
- failures with DPARA. When I added the -Od switch the problems
- went away.
-
-
- >Luc B
- >
-
- Dov
-