home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!ub!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!jslm_cif
- From: jslm_cif@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Jonathan Schulman)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: EISA machine
- Message-ID: <1992Sep14.165824.2453@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
- Date: 14 Sep 92 16:58:24 GMT
- References: <1992Sep12.195828.14013@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <1992Sep13.001835.24475@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Sep13.144934.2645@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <1992Sep14.134538.21071@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@galileo.cc.rochester.edu
- Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
- Lines: 11
- Nntp-Posting-Host: uhura.cc.rochester.edu
-
- In <1992Sep14.134538.21071@midway.uchicago.edu> sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples) writes:
-
- >That's my understanding, yes. Now you know why Microchannel
- >proponents are arguing for that route.
-
- But MCA can share interrupts and DMA channels even though it is an ISA
- card. Wait, MCA can't use ISA cards. If I remember, there really aren't
- too many EISA cards out there. How important is it to have an EISA
- machine?
-
- Thanks.
-