home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20 / NN_1992_20.iso / spool / comp / os / os2 / 311 next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-09-07  |  1.2 KB
  1. Xref: sparky comp.os.os2:311 comp.os.os2.misc:29340 comp.os.os2.programmer:4754 comp.os.os2.apps:5894 comp.os.os2.advocacy:5045
  2. Newsgroups: comp.os.os2,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.advocacy
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!nevada.edu!jimi!slumos
  4. From: slumos@unlv.edu (Steve Lumos)
  5. Subject: Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE???
  6. Message-ID: <1992Sep4.234042.9015@unlv.edu>
  7. Sender: news@unlv.edu (News User)
  8. Organization: UNLV Computer Science
  9. References: <liuyu.715128721@kramden> <1992Aug30.200246.8560@umr.edu> <liuyu.715220479@kramden>
  10. Date: Fri, 4 Sep 92 23:40:42 GMT
  11. Lines: 18
  12.  
  13. In article <liuyu.715220479@kramden> liuyu@kramden.nyu.edu (Liuyu) writes:
  14. >>I agree.  Herc should support OS/2.  They don't.
  15. >
  16. >You got it backward! OS/2 should support all standards.
  17.  
  18. Oh HELL! The 8086 is a STANDARD too! Bitch to IBM about it. If they
  19. think they are going to lose money by not supporting Herc, then they
  20. will add it. Do you want something done, or do you just want to pout?
  21.  
  22. What's all this talk about OS/2 2.0 running on CGA anyway? I was told
  23. that it would run 640x480x16 and above. Are there people out there
  24. running on CGA monitors?
  25.  
  26. TTYL - Steve
  27.  
  28.  
  29. -- 
  30. Steve Lumos - slumos@cs.unlv.edu
  31.