home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20 / NN_1992_20.iso / spool / comp / os / mswindo / programm / misc / 1785 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-09-11  |  1.1 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!lax.pe-nelson.com!lax!twbrown
  2. From: twbrown@PE-Nelson.COM (Tom W. Brown)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
  4. Subject: Re: No sscanf() in a DLL? Really?
  5. Message-ID: <602@lax.lax.pe-nelson.com>
  6. Date: 11 Sep 92 17:47:00 GMT
  7. References: <budi69.9ye@wang.com>
  8. Sender: news@lax.pe-nelson.com
  9. Organization: PE-Nelson
  10. Lines: 18
  11.  
  12. In article <budi69.9ye@wang.com>, dbushong@wang.com (Dave Bushong) writes:
  13. |> 
  14. |> Is it true that you can't use sscanf in a DLL (according to
  15. |> Microsoft's windows.h)?
  16. |> 
  17.  
  18. I'm not sure what you mean about windows.h "telling" you that sscanf isn't
  19. DLL compatible, but I'm using BC++ 3.1 and the version of sscanf in Borland's
  20. runtime is perfectly happy being called from a DLL (Borland's runtime library
  21. is available, in fact, as a DLL).
  22.  
  23.  
  24. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  25. Tom Brown               |  "Strange women, lying in ponds, distributing
  26. PE Nelson Systems       |   swords is no basis for a system of government."
  27. twbrown@pe-nelson.com   |                    Monty Python and the Holy Grail
  28. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  29.  
  30.