home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!jenk
- From: jenk@microsoft.com (Jen Kilmer)
- Subject: Re: 32-bit DOS
- Message-ID: <1992Sep07.060554.6378@microsoft.com>
- Date: 07 Sep 92 06:05:54 GMT
- Organization: Microsoft Corporation
- Summary: random scribblings
- References: <1992Aug28.103942.19508@newsroom.bsc.no> <4117@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> <1992Sep3.211915.1977@asd.com>
- Keywords: 32-bit, DOS, Advanced Operating Systems
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Sep3.211915.1977@asd.com> scott@asd.com (Scott Barman) writes:
- >In article <4117@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> aki@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us writes:
- >>Are the guys in Redmond smart enough to realize that there is need
- >>for both a gooey picture thingie _AND_ a DOS-like creature??
- >
- >Are you kidding? The idiots from Redmond were smart we'd have a
- >complete multitaksing system and wondering if they could figure out how
- >to do virtual memory by now. If they did that, they'd only be 5 years
- >behind in operating system development!
- >--
- Scott, Aki...
-
- now, now...as I was telling a stressed-out friend in the DOS
- group..."it's not like DOS is anything important...it's only
- the most-used OS in the world"...
-
- sigh....
-
- -jen
- My name's not Bill, I don't have Billions, And I don't speak for Microsoft
-
-
-
-
-
-