NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20/NN_1992_20.iso/spool/comp/os/msdos/programm/9119

Internet Message Format | 1992-09-08 | 5.2 KB

Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!benrg
From: [e-mail] (Ben Rudiak-Gould)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: djgpp 2.2.2 Q's: mouse/svga/assembler/bios
Date: 7 Sep 1992 09:24:03 GMT
Organization: U.C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
Lines: 136
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: earthquake.berkeley.edu
Summary: two answers and a "me too!"

First of all, the file DOCS\VERSION in my DJGPP distribution says,
"This distribution of DOS 386/G++ is version 1.05".  Does yours
really say, "2.2.2", or are you talking about the version number of
something else?  If the former, where did you get that version?

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (I Reid) writes:

>Question 2: Trident 8900 driver problems.
>
>I have a Tseng ET4000 based svga board with a Sierra HiColor RAMDAC
>and the standard driver (tseng4k.grd) works perfectly for everything I
>have tried so far. Unfortunately my flatmate has not had the same
>success with his trident 8900 based board (in a 486-50). We have tried
>the trident.grd and tridnt89.grd without any success. I know my test
>code is running perfectly on his machine in text mode so the problem
>is definitely something to do with the graphics. Has anyone else had
>this difficulty and found a solution?

I ran into this problem as well, and solved it.  The drivers have only
two routines--one to set a graphics mode and one to do a bank-switch.
A little bit of experimentation revealed that the bank-switch routine
was the one causing the problem.  I noticed that the source code had a
notice saying it was derived from VGAKIT 3.4.  I have 4.1 and it works
fine.  So, I changed the bank-switch code in tridnt89.asm to conform
to the new VGAKIT code, and now it works fine as well.

Here's the new bank-switch routine:

(this isn't the end of my article; it continues after the code)

;--------------------------------------------------------------------------
; Entry: AH=read page
;        AL=write page
;
; NOTE: This runs in protected mode!  Don't mess with the segment registers!
; This code must be relocatable and may not reference any data!
;
; Exit: VGA configured.
;       AX,BX,CX,DX,SI,DI may be trashed
;
; Code derived from VGAKIT version 3.4
;       Copyright 1988,89,90 John Bridges
;
; Code modified by Ben Rudiak-Gould to conform to VGAKIT version 4.1

    assume  ds:nothing, es:nothing

paging_routine  proc    far
    mov     cx,ax
    mov     dx,3ceh         ;set page size to 64k
    mov     al,6
    out     dx,al
    inc     dl
    in      al,dx
    dec     dl
    or      al,4
    mov     ah,al
    mov     al,6
    out     dx,ax

    mov     dl,0c4h         ;switch to BPS mode
    mov     al,0bh          ;was  mov ax,000bh
    out     dx,al           ;was  out dx,ax
    inc     dl              ;was nonexistent
    in      al,dx
    dec     dl              ;was nonexistent

    mov     ah,cl
    xor     ah,2
    mov     dx,3c4h
    mov     al,0eh
    out     dx,ax

    ret

paging_routine  endp

;--------------------------------------------------------------------------

>Question 4: Interrupt routines
>
>Are interrupt handlers possible using djgpp? Can anyone give me an
>example of source code for one?

I would definitely like to know this too.

>Question 4: 386 assembler and BIOS
>
>2 questions really...
>
>1. I'm fairly comfortable with 80x86 assembly language and make extensive
>   use of the inline assembly features of Borland's Turbo C compiler. I
>   read somewhere in the djgpp docs that it supports inline assembly? Can
>   anyone send me an example of some to point me in the right direction?

The assembly language supported by DJGPP is not ordinary Intel notation.
In fact, is resembles 680x0 assembly more than x86 assembly.  You can
get an example of it by compiling with the -S option, or by looking in
the LIBSRC directory.  The main differences are:

o  The destination operand is the last operand, rather than the first.

o  Registers are referred to with a prepended `%' (i.e. %eax), and
   immediate operands with a prepended `$' (i.e. $10 or $_label).  I
   think (but I'm not sure) that hexadecimal constants can be written
   as $0x89ab.

o  Register names like %bl and %cx are not used; instead, the word size
   is indicated by a letter (`b', `w', or `l') appended to the instruction
   mnemonic.  (This is not done for operations like shrd, where there is
   no possibility of confusion.)

o  Most of the addressing modes are written differently.

For example, the following function will multiply two fixed-point
integers (each with 16 bits of integer and 16 bits of fraction), and
return their product as a third:

int fixed_mul(int a, int b)
{
    asm("movl 8(%ebp),%eax");    /* get operands from stack into %eax */
    asm("movl 12(%ebp),%edx");    /* and %edx (%ebp is set up for us) */
    asm("mull %edx");        /* do the multiplication */
    asm("shrd $16,%edx,%eax");    /* shift off lower 16 bits from */
                    /* 64-bit result */

}        /* result is in %eax, which is where djgpp wants it */

Note that I deduced the assembly notation from looking at examples, and
the inline notation by trial and error.  If anybody knows of any official
documentation for this (in the full gcc package?) let me know.

--
Ben Rudiak-Gould
[e-mail]
You know, the worst thing about censorship is