home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.mail.misc:2978 comp.mail.headers:312
- Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc,comp.mail.headers
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!fmsrl7!ef2007!mjo
- From: mjo@ef2007.efhd.ford.com (Mike O'Connor)
- Subject: Re: Return-Receipt-To: header reliable?
- Message-ID: <BuD8Jn.M8t@ef2007.efhd.ford.com>
- X-Disclaimer: Not an official spokesperson for Ford OPEO
- Reply-To: Mike O'Connor <mjo@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com>
- Organization: International Affairs, Overseas Engineering, "Fordz"
- References: <1992Sep05.124731.8552@golem.uucp> <Bu9B21.J2G@ef2007.efhd.ford.com> <1992Sep10.080432.12737@Veritas.COM>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 14:06:59 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Sep10.080432.12737@Veritas.COM> tron@Veritas.COM
- (Ronald S. Karr) writes, in response to myself:
-
- :>smail also supports Return-Receipt-To: headers.
- :
- :Which smail? Smail2.5 didn't, last I checked. The official releases
- :of smail3.1 don't, although I believe that some unofficial patches are
- :filtering around that do this.
-
- Hmmmm... I recently grabbed "smail-3.1.25.tar.Z" from an archive site
- I snarfed from Archie. (I forget the name of the site -- presumably
- near the top of the list Archie generated.) It was installed and I
- mailed to said site, including a valid Return-Receipt-To: header. I
- received an ACK from the smail daemon installed at the other end. Oh
- well... it's getting smail 3.1.27 from a "blessed" archive site this
- week.
-
- ...Mike
-
-
- --
- Michael J. O'Connor | Internet: mjo@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com
- Ford Motor Company, OPEO | UUCP: ...!{backbone}!fmsrl7!mjo
- 20000 Rotunda, Bldg. 1-3001 | Phone: +1 (313) 248-1260
- Dearborn, MI 48121 | Fax: +1 (313) 323-6277
-