home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!wupost!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!FRORS12.BITNET!TURGUT
- Message-ID: <REXXLIST%92090714463616@HEARN>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.rexx
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 14:45:24 EDT
- Sender: REXX Programming discussion list <REXXLIST@UGA.BITNET>
- From: Turgut Kalfaoglu <TURGUT@FRORS12.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: newbie rexx programmer asks silly questions
- In-Reply-To: Message of Thu, 3 Sep 92 19:01:21 PDT from <GOMBERG@UCSFVM>
- Lines: 4
-
- I'd recomment OS/2's Rexx over others. No limitations on memory or anything!
- It accepts direct OS function calls (DosSetPrty, DosSleep...anything...),
- has a fairly fast interpreter, and it feels just like VM's, with
- 'trace i' and even its error messages. -turgut
-